Mika Lipp vs Mikalai Haliak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Lipp has a slight edge in second serve points, winning 40.79% compared to Haliak's 36.89% over the last six months.
• How crucial are return games in determining match outcomes? Lipp has been more effective, winning 51.55% on opponent's second serves, while Haliak wins 47.32%. For first serve returns, Lipp leads by achieving 37.13% versus Haliak's 28.51%.
• How do breakpoints impact player performance under pressure? Lipp has a slight advantage, saving 51.38% of breakpoints against them, while Haliak saves 47.73%.
• Who has the edge in overall win percentage over the last year? Haliak has a slight advantage with a 54% win rate, compared to Lipp's 53.33%.
• What surfaces benefit each player? Haliak excels on grass (67%), while Lipp performs best on clay (54%). Both have struggled on other surfaces.
• When looking at player levels in tournaments, Haliak has a better win rate in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events at 60.98% compared to Lipp's 53.33%.
• How does opponent quality affect player performance? Lipp has faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 240.53 compared to Haliak's 448.62.
• In deciding set situations, Haliak wins 54% compared to Lipp's 35%, offering insight for potential live predictions.
• Breaking opportunities are crucial; Lipp converts at 42.02% while Haliak's rate is 37.5%, which is useful for in-game betting.

Editorial Prediction (July 18, 2025, UTC):

Lipp holds a slight advantage in several key metrics such as second serve performance and ability to return serves, both first and second. These have strong correlations with match outcomes and are indicative of controlling the pace of gameplay.

While both players have similar overall win rates in the past year, Haliak's ability to excel in deciding sets is a notable factor. However, Lipp’s exposure to better-ranked opponents may provide an edge in poise and resilience under high-stakes conditions.

In terms of surfaces, neither player's favorite venue aligns perfectly with this match, yet Lipp’s performance on clay suggests adaptability which might be beneficial. Furthermore, the ability to convert breakpoints more often positions Lipp as potentially more aggressive during crucial moments.

Considering all statistical factors, Lipp appears to have a slight upper hand going into this match, suggesting they are more likely to clinch victory. However, Haliak’s form in deciding sets should not be underestimated if the match becomes tightly contested. The prediction leans towards Lipp emerging as the likely winner in this encounter.